In mathematics, contour sets generalize and formalize the everyday notions of

  • everything superior to something
  • everything superior or equivalent to something
  • everything inferior to something
  • everything inferior or equivalent to something.

Formal definitions

Given a relation on pairs of elements of set

and an element of

The upper contour set of is the set of all that are related to :

The lower contour set of is the set of all such that is related to them:

The strict upper contour set of is the set of all that are related to without being in this way related to any of them:

The strict lower contour set of is the set of all such that is related to them without any of them being in this way related to :

The formal expressions of the last two may be simplified if we have defined

so that is related to but is not related to , in which case the strict upper contour set of is

and the strict lower contour set of is

Contour sets of a function

In the case of a function considered in terms of relation , reference to the contour sets of the function is implicitly to the contour sets of the implied relation

Examples

Arithmetic

Consider a real number , and the relation . Then

  • the upper contour set of would be the set of numbers that were greater than or equal to ,
  • the strict upper contour set of would be the set of numbers that were greater than ,
  • the lower contour set of would be the set of numbers that were less than or equal to , and
  • the strict lower contour set of would be the set of numbers that were less than .

Consider, more generally, the relation

Then

  • the upper contour set of would be the set of all such that ,
  • the strict upper contour set of would be the set of all such that ,
  • the lower contour set of would be the set of all such that , and
  • the strict lower contour set of would be the set of all such that .

It would be technically possible to define contour sets in terms of the relation

though such definitions would tend to confound ready understanding.

In the case of a real-valued function (whose arguments might or might not be themselves real numbers), reference to the contour sets of the function is implicitly to the contour sets of the relation

Note that the arguments to might be vectors, and that the notation used might instead be

Economics

In economics, the set could be interpreted as a set of goods and services or of possible outcomes, the relation as strict preference, and the relationship as weak preference. Then

  • the upper contour set, or better set,[1] of would be the set of all goods, services, or outcomes that were at least as desired as ,
  • the strict upper contour set of would be the set of all goods, services, or outcomes that were more desired than ,
  • the lower contour set, or worse set,[1] of would be the set of all goods, services, or outcomes that were no more desired than , and
  • the strict lower contour set of would be the set of all goods, services, or outcomes that were less desired than .

Such preferences might be captured by a utility function , in which case

  • the upper contour set of would be the set of all such that ,
  • the strict upper contour set of would be the set of all such that ,
  • the lower contour set of would be the set of all such that , and
  • the strict lower contour set of would be the set of all such that .

Complementarity

On the assumption that is a total ordering of , the complement of the upper contour set is the strict lower contour set.

and the complement of the strict upper contour set is the lower contour set.

See also

References

  1. 1 2 Robert P. Gilles (1996). Economic Exchange and Social Organization: The Edgeworthian Foundations of General Equilibrium Theory. Springer. p. 35. ISBN 9780792342007.

Bibliography

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.